The quintessential aren’t said bad hooking up effects integrated regret over a particular lover (45

Descriptive Statistics

Normally, members said that have 2.1 (SD = step 1.71) hookup lovers and you may linking everything six times (SD = 8.5) prior to now 3 months. Overall, 34.8% from pupils advertised with non-safe sex while in the a connections. 0%), impact intimately unhappy (39.0%), feel dissapointed about one a hookup went past an acceptable limit (thirty five.3%), and pity (35.1%).


An enthusiastic EFA given facts you to definitely studies were sufficiently unidimensional meet up with the fresh presumptions of your IRT investigation (RMSEA = .053, RMSR = .09, ? dos (119) = , CFI = .94, proportion of the earliest to help you 2nd eigenvalue = 5.5:1). Every products were undoubtedly piled towards the unmarried grounds (activities loading .36 so you’re able to .83). 1

Item Complement

Badly suitable affairs was in fact got rid of about size centered on complement plots and you can modified ? 2 /df percentages (Stark, Chernyshenko, & Drasgow, 2005). Modified ? dos /df ratios more than three getting single, twice and you can triplet affairs was basically individuals for deletion (Drasgow, Levine, Tsien, Williams, & Mead, 1995). A single items “I’ve considered distressed one to a hookup didn’t generate myself feel great regarding the me personally a day later” is actually removed according to poor goods match.

Table step one merchandise the fresh new parameter rates and fundamental problems of your left 16 affairs. Item slopes (a) varied out of 0.69 so you can 2.84. The location details (b) varied of 0.14 (regretting a connection) to 2.73 (hiring an STI). IIFs and you can item discrimination (a) were checked out to identify factors to become employed about finally scale. Items that got lower discrimination and you may reduced item information had been applicants to possess removal, and two facts (“I’ve worried that i may have gotten pregnant otherwise received my personal link companion expecting” and “My friends enjoys teased me regarding a connection.”) was got rid of throughout the scale (an excellent = 0.69 and 0.87 correspondingly). Removing these things regarding the scale had absolutely nothing effect on new limited reliability to possess ? (16 circumstances roentgen = 0.78 and you can 14-activities r = 0.76). The very last 14-items adaptation had appropriate quantities of reliability and you may important mistake away from aspect ( Shape step 1 ). New size is best during the assessing bad results for those whose ? dropped within indicate (? = 0; roentgen = .85) and you may step 1.5 standard deviation over the imply (? = 1.5; roentgen = .84).

Test information and fundamental error regarding dimensions features to possess 14-item measure. Solid range means full suggestions; dotted line ways important mistake. Theta is plotted out of 2 SD below the mean to three SD above the mean.

Differential Item Doing work

IRTLRDIF was utilized to recognize five anchor factors (affairs cuatro, 8, twelve, and you will fourteen). With these point facts, we recognized six extra products that was indeed DIF totally free (circumstances 1, step 3, 5, seven, ten, 13) and you may four issues which have DIF (products dos, six, nine, 11). All four situations displayed high DIF regarding b factor (difficulty), not the brand new ? factor (discrimination). The final calibration of your five items with DIF is actually revealed for the Desk dos . Within the each situation, boys required highest quantities of the hidden attribute to promote the item. For example, whenever you are girls who’d a latent trait get approximately 0.65 SD above the suggest had a great fifty% probability of appearing that they had noticed disappointed one a connections lover have not contacted her or him pursuing the connection, males with a hidden attribute score as much as one or two SD above the mean had a great fifty% odds of endorsing the same goods.

Table 2

For both female and male youngsters, the number of connecting bad has an effect on try positively correlated with quantity of connections couples, r(284) = .33, p Table step 3 ). In support of brand new standard-related legitimacy of one’s NIHI, members which advertised with engaged in unprotected sex one or more times through the a link prior to now 3 months said deeper bad link consequences (Yards = cuatro.forty-eight, SD = 3.46) than just people which didn’t have unprotected sex (Meters = dos.72, SD = 2.71), t(605) = six.89, p ***

.05 .twenty five ** .thirty five *** .thirty five ***
V2 Level of couples .twenty four *** .twenty-eight *** .03 .03 .03
V3 Link regularity .03 .39 *** ?.07 .01 .04
V4 Despair .twenty-five ** ?.04 .ten .68 *** .70 ***
V5 Anxiety .26 ** ?.04 ?.03 .68 *** .77 ***
V6 Stress .twenty-eight *** ?.02 .07 .72 *** .69 ***
0 commenti

Lascia un Commento

Vuoi partecipare alla discussione?
Fornisci il tuo contributo!

Lascia un commento

Il tuo indirizzo email non sarà pubblicato.